War is no spectator sport: Carmichael in College sponsored NY Times piece

Civil War Institute director encourages the American public to find a usable past in Civil War history
2013 banner

Gettysburg College Prof. Peter Carmichael authored a piece on finding a usable past in Civil War history that appeared in the June 30 New York Times Sunday Review, a day before the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg.

His piece is the fourth in a seven-part series sponsored by Gettysburg College, and designed to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the American Civil War and generate thoughtful discourse about its legacy.Peter Carmichael

The full text of Carmichael’s piece is below.

War is no spectator sport: Finding a usable past in Civil War history

Tucked away on a hillside, hidden from visitors who descend upon Gettysburg every year, are the outlines of a Civil War burial trench. One of the thousands of Southerners scattered in shallow graves across the battlefield was North Carolinian Charles Futch, shot in the head while fighting next to his sibling John, who never left his dying brother’s side. After burying him in an anonymous grave, a semi-literate John poured out his tortured feelings in a letter home. “Charly got kild and he suffered [a] gratdeal,” he wrote, “[and] I don’t want nothing to eat hardly for I am . . . sick all the time and half crazy. I never wanted to come home so bad in my life.”

In the story of the Futch brothers are timeless questions about what it means to be a nation at war today. How soldiers cope with the trauma of combat, how poverty shapes the military experience, and how acts of mourning influence political loyalties are inquiries that make history engaging and relevant. Unfortunately, the 150th Commemoration of the Civil War has largely missed an opportunity to make the past usable. Too many historians have been afraid to ask hard questions, much of the public is seduced by the heroic view of war, and Congress has defunded the National Park Service (NPS).

How can we find a usable past at our historical sites when Congress has transformed the NPS’ emblem into an easy target for spending cuts? The Shermanesque slash and burn approach in Washington has made them a casualty of this fiscal policy of attrition.

The funding crisis will continue to gut educational programs. But that should not prevent historians from asking the public to consider the methods of fighting, the treatment of veterans, the plight of refugees, and the politics of warfare from the Civil War to today. Journalists, for instance, report that drone strikes can create more enemies than they eliminate, just as the Federal shelling of Petersburg and Atlanta strengthened Confederate loyalties for many white Southerners. Here is just one example as to how the public can consider contemporary issues through the portal of the Civil War. It will take bold teaching, both in the classroom and at historic sites, to create a civic space where people feel free to exchange opposing ideas about the past and today.

As we commemorate the Sesquicentennial, too many historians have positioned the bloodletting of the Civil War on a trajectory of human progress and freedom, lulling Americans into believing that wars are always ennobling. The tragic stories of the Futch brothers gradually disappear, like the faint gravesites on the battlefield, since they exist outside of the arc of progress. Americans’ understanding of Gettysburg, as a result, comes through the comforting words of Abraham Lincoln that “none have died in vain.” John Futch clearly did not share Lincoln’s conclusion.

For those who say that finding a usable past risks alienating general audiences, it is important to remember that historians during the Civil War’s Centennial offered a similar defense for not dealing with race and slavery, claiming that such matters were too controversial, too political, and too divisive for a public in denial about the continued injustices to black America.

Although it is deeply gratifying to see how the current 150th commemorations have trumped the Centennial’s celebration of reunion at the expense of race, I fear that we are leaving our own distinct legacy of omission if we allow Americans to retreat into a fantasy world in which war becomes a spectator sport. In contemplating our Civil War history, we need to find ways to awaken Americans to their civic responsibilities, to both the nation and the world as the United States confronts a dark and quite possibly an inescapable future of unending global conflict.

Peter S. Carmichael is the Director of the Civil War Institute and Robert C. Fluhrer Professor of Civil War Studies at Gettysburg College.

Find out more about Gettysburg College's Sesquicentennial Commemoration of the American Civil War and the New York Times series at www.gettysburg.edu/cw2013.

Founded in 1832, Gettysburg College is a highly selective four-year residential college of liberal arts and sciences with a strong academic tradition. Alumni include Rhodes Scholars, a Nobel laureate, and other distinguished scholars. The college enrolls 2,600 undergraduate students and is located on a 200-acre campus adjacent to the Gettysburg National Military Park in Pennsylvania.

Contact: Nikki Rhoads, senior assistant director of communications, 717.337.6803

Posted: Sun, 30 Jun 2013

Comments

Bravo!! An excellent piece! Thank you!

Kerry Walters | Posted Jun 30, 2013 07:40 PM


When did Lincoln ever say "none have died in vain?" He urged "that we here highly resolve, that these dead shall not have died in vain," and he was referring to the same men he mentioned earlier in his address, those "who here gave their lives that that nation might live." Lincoln praised and honored the men of the Army of the Potomac, the "boys in blue." Nowhere in the address does he refer, even obliquely, to the Confederate dead. Of course every Rebel died in vain; the South lost the war.

John Cushing | Posted Jul 01, 2013 06:47 PM


I very much agree with this perspective. I can't imagine the feelings of a Confederate soldier as he emerged from the woods as part of Picket's charge. He had to know it was likely he would not survive to make it to the top of the ridge. He had to understand his death would not be easy. These feelings were confirmed by the carnage as they walked then ran up the hill. When I visit the battlefield I am always taken by the enormity of suffering and by the understanding that most soldiers knew they would suffer badly.

Jay Kappmeier - 1963 | Posted Jul 05, 2013 11:28 AM


 

 
 

Related Stories



Subscribe

Get all the latest news delivered to your inbox or RSS reader:

  • News - profiles, event coverage, campus updates
  • Athletics - scores and highlights
  • In the Media - faculty, alumni and students featured in the media
  • Photo of the Day - images from campus and the community

Submit a story idea

The Office of Communications and Marketing is looking for stories about Gettysburgians doing great work.

Send your suggestions to news@gettysburg.edu.